![]() “It was a deliberate, brazen and blatant intellectual property violation in order to gain competitive advantage in the marketplace. “This is not an accident but a strategy,” says a source familiar with the matter. The second suit is for extensive copying of Cisco’s user manuals and command line structures, right down to the grammatical errors within them. One suit is for patent infringement, which charges Arista with violating 14 Cisco patents for 12 features in the Arista EOS operating system.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |